🔗 Share this article

Established political parties are more and more enabling the radical right to set the public discourse, according to a new research conducted in the Federal Republic of Germany.

Researchers discovered that this phenomenon has unwittingly helped far-right parties by legitimising their viewpoints and disseminating them to a broader audience.

Study Drawing from Two Decades of News Reporting

The findings, released in the academic journal on political studies, utilized an automated text analysis of over 520,000 news pieces from a half-dozen national publications.

Capital-based researchers observed that as the far right shifted from fringe issues in the 1990s era to core subjects like integration and immigration, mainstream political groups progressively adapted their messaging in reaction.

This adjustment boosted the dissemination of these ideas and indicated to voters that such stances were acceptable.

Consequences for Democracy

"Public communication by mainstream political groups is crucial in the electoral success of the radical right," stated a expert in political behavior participating in the research.

"This factor has been overlooked," she added.

The impact was evident even when conventional parties were condemning the radical faction. "They still receive focus," the expert remarked. "The main point is that because we live in such a battle for attention, this focus is crucial."

Normalisation Phenomenon Throughout Europe

While the research was focused on Germany, this normalisation effect is probable to apply to nations throughout Europe.

"This is frequently observed in German and British news outlets," said another co-author. "The far right says something and everyone begins discussing it for several days."

"Although you're opposing it, you're repeating it," he added.

Toughening of Public Rhetoric

At certain points, political figures have also hardened their language to match that of the radical right.

In a recent discussion, a former German chancellor called for large-scale deportations and urged them to happen "more often and faster."

Comparable examples can be observed throughout Europe, as politicians from nations including the UK to France embrace the language of the far right, especially on immigration.

This has formed an echo chamber that was inconceivable a decade ago.

Central Problem: Who Dictates the Narrative?

"{If you're a centrist party and you are discussing cultural issues – immigration, assimilation – in a way that is determined by the pace of the radical right, that's the essence of narrative control," clarified a study author.

Other political parties have taken additional measures, attempting to emulate the hardline agenda of the far right, despite studies suggests that this approach drives the electorate to cast their ballot for the radical faction.

Progressive Impact and Public Perception

The extent of data collected revealed that the impact of radical groups had been progressive and had grown over time.

"Voter awareness doesn't change from one day to another," stated a co-author. "However, when you hear this negative framing around immigration frequently, and it is being disseminated not only by far-right parties but also, for example, by established parties, then of course this storyline gains more traction."

Requirement for Mainstream Groups to Develop Their Own Discourses

The study highlighted the necessity for established parties to carve out their distinct discourses, especially on topics such as immigration and assimilation, instead of continuously trailing after the radical right.

"It's like a dance," said one author. "If the conductor is radical and you're reacting to it, you cannot decide which music should be heard."